Writing a discussion section of thesis writing
Students often make the mistake of including quotations without any other information.
Discussion section of a research paper example
Starting the Task Most people are likely to write this section best by preparing an outline, setting out the broad thrust of the argument, and how your results support it. By embedding your examples in the context, you are essentially highlighting to the reader what you want them to remember. Clearly explain why these results are acceptable and how they consistently fit in with previously published knowledge about the subject. Expert internal reviewers have a profound knowledge about the subject, and they can provide guidance about the writing process of the manuscript ie. However, our data revealed a highly heterogeneous local population in which neighboring neurons could have very similar or very different response properties. These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters. Be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Well, your findings chapter is sort of like a really lame movie script. Besides application of a template which contains the intended clear-cut messages to be followed will contribute to the communication of net messages. If a limitation is applicable to the method chosen to gather information, then describe in detail the problems you encountered and why. Finally, our data describing strong correlation between noise correlation during on-going activity and during auditory stimuli support the idea that distributed groups of interconnected neurons are coactivated during tone stimulation. Now you need to consider how you might present these findings in the most logical way to the reader. This can focus your mind on what the results actually show and help you to sort them in your head. Bates College; Hess, Dean R. Sometimes the recommendations are saved for the conclusion.
If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed and helped fill gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described, and Engage the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of information.
For a more thorough description of the term conclusion as it applies to academic writing, you can refer to this post. Fleshing Out the Detail Once you have your outline in front of you, you can start to map out how your results fit into the outline.
Providing no conclusions. Unusual findings can be good, but they might also elicit more questions from the committee and other readers, so make sure you have all the answers. Therefore, the authors should go over the manuscript for at least three times after finalization of the manuscript based on joint decision.
This can be framed as new research questions that emerged as a result of your analysis. This can be followed by any recommendations for further research. It needs to demonstrate how you have attempted to answer your research questions.
based on 49 review